CO129-024 - Bonham - 1848 [3-6] — Page 347

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next

considers that he did not.

not gain

the

suit, and in consequence lost his

Costs, through

:through the irregularity of the Government Land officers. and from misinformation that

he had received from Mr. Tarrant:

and this

this from

the

Attorney

General's recorded opinion, which Enclosure to Sir John Davis's Despatch N. 18 of 27th

forms

January

would

uld appear to be

Mr Parker's view

of the

In alluding

case.

to Mr Jarrauto

"present circumstances",

I certainly

infer Sir John Davis meant

say

that as Mr. Tarrant was

longer in Government employ, it would be inexpedient to call

him for

sum said to be

lost through his negligence.

Sir John Davis ordered Mr

344

Parker's Bill to be paid from

the Public funds

arr

the 31.

January last, and M. Jurvanté

services were

with

finally dispensed

from the 12 October

preceding.

As connected with this

subject, I think it

right to acquaint your Lordship that I am informed by Mr. Everly,

the

John

Sir

Surveyor General, that Sir

Davis had it in con

contemplation

tion to abolish Mr. Farrault's

office of Registrar of Deeds.

Seven

eight months it was finally

before it was

execution; and it I think be

be justly

carried into

may therefore

concluded that

his removal from office did not originate in, although it might have been expedited by

Edit History

2026-05-17 03:36:05 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

considers that he did not. not gain the suit, and in consequence lost his Costs, through :through the irregularity of the Government Land officers. and from misinformation that he had received from Mr. Tarrant: and this this from the Attorney General's recorded opinion, which Enclosure to Sir John Davis's Despatch N. 18 of 27th forms ar January would uld appear to be Mr Parker's view of the In alluding case. to Mr Jarrauto "present circumstances", I certainly infer Sir John Davis meant say that as Mr. Tarrant was longer in Government employ, it would be inexpedient to call him for sum said to be lost through his negligence. Sir John Davis ordered Mr 344 Parker's Bill to be paid from the Public funds arr the 31. January last, and M. Jurvanté services were with finally dispensed from the 12 October preceding. As connected with this subject, I think it right to acquaint your Lordship that I am informed by Mr. Everly, the John Sir Surveyor General, that Sir Davis had it in con contemplation tion to abolish Mr. Farrault's office of Registrar of Deeds. Seven eight months it was finally before it was execution; and it I think be be justly carried into may therefore concluded that his removal from office did not originate in, although it might have been expedited by

Baseline (Original)

4. considers that he did not. not gain the suit, and in consequence lost his Costs, through :through the irregularity of the Government Land officers . and from misinformation that he had received from Mr. Tariant : and this this from the attorney Leneral's recorded opinion, which Enclosure to Sir John Davis's Despatch N. 18 of 27t forms ar January would uld appear to be Mr Parker's view of the In alluding case. to Mr Jarrauto " present circumstances"," I certainly infer Sir John Davis meant say that as Mr. Tarrant was longer in Government employs inexpedient to call it would be be in the him for sum said to be lost through his negligence .. Sir John Davis ordered Mr 344 Parker's Bill to be paid frome- the Public funds arr the 31. Jammary last, and M. Jurvanté services were with finally dispensed the from the 122 october preceding. As connected with this subject, I think it right to acquaint your Lordship that I am informed by Mr. Eleverly, the John Sir surveyer General, that ser Davis had it in con contempla. tion to abolish Mr. Farrauts office of Registrar of Deeds. Seven eight months it was finally before it was execution; and it I think be be justly carried into may therefore concluded that his removal from office did- not originate in, although it might have been expedited by

2026-05-17 03:36:05 · Baseline

View content

considers that he did not.

not gain

the

suit, and in consequence lost his

Costs, through

:through the irregularity of the Government Land officers . and from misinformation that

he had received from Mr. Tariant :

and this

this from

the

attorney

Leneral's recorded opinion, which Enclosure to Sir John Davis's Despatch N. 18 of 27t